As I cited last week, the Mahabharata and the Ramayana are the main written sources of Hindu myth as presented in much of the Khmer architecture. We studied the principle myths and had the task of teaching them to our family so that they could recognize the symbolism when they saw it. Each of us chose a different way of relating the stories we studied. My little sister was assigned to the Churning of the Sea of Milk and because she knew it was a song she made up a tune and sang it to us. This is an excerpt of the action in that story:
The Sea of Churning Milk as a bas relief |
A portion of a shadow puppet presentation of the Sea of Churning Milk |
And, joined in awful council, planned
To live, unharmed by age and time,
Immortal in their youthful prime.
Then this was, after due debate,
The counsel of the wise and great,
To churn with might the milky sea 3
The life-bestowing drink to free.
This planned, they seized the Serpent King,
Vásuki, for their churning-string,
And Mandar's mountain for their pole,
And churned with all their heart and soul.
As thus, a thousand seasons through,
This way and that the snake they drew,
Biting the rocks, each tortured head,
A very deadly venom shed.
...
Then Vishnu, bearing shell, and mace,
And discus, showed his radiant face,
And thus addressed in smiling glee
The Trident wielding deity:
What treasure first the Gods upturn
From troubled Ocean, as they churn,
Should--for thou art the eldest--be
Conferred, O best of Gods, on thee.
To read the rest click here. In Cambodia we saw dramatization, puppet shows, murals, and recitation of this story. We had expected it to be fairly ubiquitous in the architecture but were not prepared for how common it was in performance. In The Search for the Perfect Language Eco cites a reference about the power of performance. It says in effect that even though the observer may not understand the meaning of words experiencing a performance has power in it self and conveys a special meaning.
Cambodians in the temple just after performing as Aspara |
As churning still the Immortals toiled,
Of winning face and lovely frame,
Forth sixty million fair ones came.
Born of the foam and water, these
Were aptly named Apsarases.
Me and my sisters doing our heavenly dance by the Aspara |
The main thing I wanted to bring up here was that as mentioned by Ong the narrative conveyed by this oral tradition allowed us to remember important information about the cultures as a whole. Presenting information in the form of a narrative was an effective mnenomic device to help us with elements not directly related to the story. Further the mode of oral communication be it dance or song or simple retelling varied how well we remembered the information. We remembered the stories much better if we participated in performing them than if we simply read them. As a way of educating people and having them remember, story telling and ritual performance seems more effective than reading. It is more internalized. The institutions that controlled the myths wanted to communicate the information in a way that would be transformative in the lives of the hearers. Although the majority of the people could not read to discover the stories themselves, they still were able to learn and remember the myths of their culture.
From personal experience, I completely agree with your comments on the ways in which we retain our learning. The more and different ways you experience a story the better. I have heard it said that the more senses you employ learning something, the better you remember it. Performances definitely employ more senses than just watching a storyteller sitting on a chair, for both the audience and the tellers. Like the difference between a lecture and a demonstration. Performing is a pretty common oral learning institution, and it really helps pass on information from one generation to the next, as they take over the job of performing from their parents, and participate in the traditions year after year.
ReplyDeleteWeird side note: in my research on learning retention, I found an interesting article/blog that claims to debunk a prevalent myth about learning. It's at this site (sorry I couldn't figure out the linking in comment thing):
http://www.willatworklearning.com/2006/05/people_remember.html
Awesome post Alicia. That's way cool you've been to cambodia. Thats so random too. haha. I thought it was interesting, as we talked in class, and also my reading how important poetical devices were and are in oral knowledge. As mnemonic devices, rhyme and other sound devices really help us remember a lot more.
ReplyDeleteEven today as I was watching the speakers at the LDS General Conference, I couldn't help but notice how sound devices are used in their discourses. There is just something very appealing to the ear about hearing alliteration and repetition of consonant sounds. To me, it's like a game that we play or an art to put the words together in those ways. Usually Elder Holland wins wordsmith of the day at conference, but I have to say that L. Whitney Clayton was today's wordsmith of the day.
Morgan, That is crazy i have seen that figure cited a number of times, I had no idea that it was all, well, fictitious. It makes me wonder two things, one what real research has been done to show retention differs for various modes of presentations and two is that the equivalent of a psychological urban legend and does that fit into our oral learning unit? Because it is something presented by an authority figure and simply passed on. Maybe we are being too narrow in our definition of oral.
ReplyDeleteGreat post, Alicia! I really enjoyed reading it. But my comment is mostly going to be directed at the other comments here. Do we really have a working definition of oral knowledge? I mean, it seems like it should be pretty self-explanatory, but it has been surprising to me how many times in the last week or so, since we began this unit, I have stopped to wonder about something and whether or not it counts as oral knowledge. I guess I've also just noticed how often these different classifications we use can and do blend together.
ReplyDeleteI agree with lauren the definition seems a little hazy to me, like a little too "all inclusive"... oftentimes I think that formal, institutionalized learning makes me a little to narrow minded...
ReplyDeleteAnother thing is that learning is all about experience. We have been talking about that but I wanted to add my two cents. It all boils down to experience. When we read a text book or listen to a teacher talk or hear a friends story we are just hearing their experiences. Without language/oral language we would basically be confined to learning through our own experiences. While first hand experience is crucial, we need to learn by others' experiences too. It is impossible to truly walk a mile in another man's shoes, the best we can do is listen empathetically to his experiences, but without language we wouldn't even be able to do that...
here is morgans link for convenience sake
ReplyDeleteI agree with Will's comment. But I also think that we can connect to others' experiences by participating in the storytelling or whatever it may be, not just by listening orally. Like Morgan said, "the more senses you employ learning something, the better you remember it." You don't necessarily need to communicate orally, because people can always draw or act out stories, but language certainly does help.
ReplyDeleteWill, thanks for putting up Morgan's link so it was easy to get to. I like your expansion to experience. I guess that is the whole point of communicating: sharing experience.
ReplyDeleteI just had a thought maybe oral and written communication are hard to pin down because it is a mode rather than a medium. It could be kind of like Mother tongue and father tongue. The way that they communicate experience is what matters rather than the medium. So you could write an essay in the style of oral tradition, even though it is still written.
How's that for existentialism?