I mentioned last week that Facsimile 2 is a hypocephalus. Michael D. Rhodes, an Egyptologist and associate professor of ancient scripture at BYU, provides a more thorough explanation with the following:
“A hypocephalus is a small disk-shaped object made of papyrus, stuccoed linen, bronze, gold, wood, or clay, which the Egyptians placed under the head of their dead. They believed it would magically cause the head and body to be enveloped in flames or radiance, thus making the deceased divine. The hypocephalus itself symbolized the eye of Re or Horus, i.e., the sun, and the scenes portrayed on it relate to the Egyptian concept of the resurrection and life after death” (Michael D. Rhodes, The Joseph Smith Hypocephalus . . . Seventeen Years Later [F.A.R.M.S. paper, RHO-94], 1).
We see that, as a whole the facsimile is made to represent an eye. The eye, symbolically, peers into the soul or inner thoughts of the individual. In this case we peer into the inner thoughts and desires of the Lord, which in Moses 1:39 we learn that His desire is our immortality and eternal life. This means that the whole focus of Facsimile 2 is about mankind's eternal life.
Another important factor of the facsimile is the centrality of God. The entire Facsimile is obviously a circle. At the very center of the Facsimile there appears to be an X. It is actually worn around the neck shown here on the Egyptian god Osiris.
This symbolic representation of the centrality of God lends meaning to scriptures like:
D&C 88:41 He acomprehendeth all things, and all things are before him, and all things are round about him; and he is above all things, and in all things, and is through all things, and is round about all things; and all things are by him, and of him, even God, forever and ever.
and other scriptures like: Abraham 3:21, 3 Nephi 27:14, 3 Nephi 15:9, JS-Matthew 1:27, Moses 7:62-63, D&C 101:22, D&C 42:36, D&C 39:22
It also suggests the concept of God residing on a center planet (Facsimile 2:1)
On that note and at the risk of going too deep into deep doctrine too deep for me to climb back out of I close this more in depth study of two important parts of Facsimile 2. If you wish to study more click here for the above mentioned book. There definitely is lots of information out there to debunk a little bit of the mystery of this example of the occult.
More interesting reading on The Book of Abraham in general and other intriguing topics can be found here or here.
Also you can check out Hugh Nibley's article about whether or not today is the day in which much of the previously kept hidden information would be revealed. On this subject I would like to close with saying, Joseph Smith translated/explained only the pictorial symbols and non of the text itself.... I don't know about you but that makes me super curious to find out the rest!
Very cool post. I found it interesting all the symbolism that God uses, even the shape of the facsimile, which you said represents an eye. It made me think of the scripture which states that in order to bring salvation to our soul we must have "an eye single to the glory of God" (Doctrine and Covenants 4:5). I'm excited to see if any of the non translated figures will be translated in our lifetime!
ReplyDeleteI should always save my comment before posting it because sometimes it disappears.
ReplyDeleteI was looking through the book that will linked to in his post. It had some pretty cool stuff. I read a paragraph that said something like -- the question is what were abraham and joseph smith trying to teach us by their interpretations of these pictures? This phrase got me thinking of something I have always wondered. Were these facsimiles written by someone who believed in the God of Abraham or were they written with original egyptian meanings and then abraham and joseph smith used the symbols interpreted to teach us something in context of the Gospel. I hope that made sense. What do ya'll think/know about this?
Hmm... puzzling over your question Mike, I think it could have been either way, but i think it is more likely that it is correct knowledge, truth about God and the universe, and whether it comes from a more Hebraic source or from the Egyptian folk religion doesn't really matter. Though I do think it is more likely (as Will suggested in his last post) that the mummy with this hypocephalus was an associate of Abraham, and was also aware of the teaching and religion of the fathers (like in Abraham 1:2, the blessings of the fathers). Or it could have been someone who knew and admired Abraham as a wise and powerful man, though not knowing the source, and asked him to make his hypocephalus (though I am not sure if that is how they originate). Those are just a few of my speculations.
ReplyDeleteIn my course on the history of the New Testament the professor had a lecture on the Joseph Smith translation. I have notes from it if anyone is more interested. In essence there were 5 different reasons for something to be retranslated. 1 it was mistranslated 2 to restore something that was missing 3 to restore the author's intended meaning 4 to update it so that modern readers could understand it 5 to reveal new doctrine to the saints. Honestly I think any of those could be at work in the papyrus. Maybe someone wrote down exactly what Abraham said, maybe on the other extreme it was a vehicle to enable the revelation regardless of the actual text. Interesting to think about. What ever the exact mechanism, I am glad that we have access to the doctrines presented in it.
ReplyDeleteMore Nibley sources, if I may:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.amazon.com/One-Eternal-Round-Hugh-Nibley/dp/160641237X/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1321330532&sr=1-1
and
http://www.amazon.com/Message-Joseph-Smith-Papyri-Endowment/dp/159038539X/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1321330584&sr=1-1
and
http://www.amazon.com/Collected-Works-Hugh-Nibley-vol/dp/1606410547/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1321330613&sr=1-1