We had the feel of folk knowledge
in our groups and strong community ties that were created by sharing
knowledge in class and on the blog. I had a place to be, physically
in the class (...Hey, that's MY seat!...) but also within a group
that was mine to learn from and support in their own learning. We
shared our life “folk knowledge” experiences, and it brought us
closer together. I also had the opportunity to learn some new folk
knowledge with my group: how to post and comment on a blog. There
were also the more obvious experiences that we were assigned to
participate in, where we had to teach and learn a folk skill, and
then the amazing class about the gift of bread. Besides getting to
eat something, I really appreciated the simple goodness of folk
knowledge and the power its products can have in lives after her
presentation.
With oral knowledge, we had the
responsibility to participate in a Greek Chorus recital of an Ancient
American religious speech. When I delivered my part, I realized that
my memory was an important tool in imparting knowledge to future
generations and fellow classmates. Of course, the whole modern
institution of a university course is based on oral instruction,
lecturing, and excellent professors appreciate the true value of that
teaching style. Dynamic lecturers teach what they know from memory
and make sure you understand, then accept when you know more about a
subject and they allow you to share those examples and participate in
the teaching process. It is a give and take experience that is
essential to the correct function of the oral institution.
With written knowledge, there
were several different opportunities that made the unit worthwhile.
The opportunity to do our own writing and translating of ancient
languages from civilizations around the globe was a unique, tactile
exploration of what it meant to value a piece of information enough
to take the time to write (or carve or etch) it. Throughout the
course, we were encouraged to participate in activities outside class
assignments, and our group did that, learning from each other about
calligraphy and writing styles. A classmate commented in the salon
today that the majority of this class was communicating ideas through
the written word, even if the materials were different (keys and
websites instead of pens and paper). The format of our “homework
assignments” taught me more about a knowledge institution, how to
really communicate with an audience through the written word.
Finally, the print knowledge unit
included brilliant guest speakers that helped me appreciate books in
a new way. To see with my eyes the history of books in real
specimens and to hear from other oral experts solidified the
knowledge in a way abstract discussion could not have. The assigned,
individual field trip had the same effect. The bibliography
assignment (…we don't have to write a paper on it... scandalous...)
was a eye-opener to the wonders of printed reference, to the library
itself. I never realized how many books there could be, so specific
on such obscure topics as the history of dictionaries or rhyming.
Unfortunately with all these varying experiences and assignments, and
other unnamed ones, it was a bit of a let-down to write a
traditional academic paper.
In the end, all the types of
knowledge were employed to make a truly educational class. Folk
communities and skills, oral lectures and interviews, written clay
and paper and blog posts, and printed book discoveries all combined
to make the class engaging, sealed together with new technology.
Though I may not remember every word of every discussion, or every
power point, I will be able to remember the different mediums and
styles of learning that reinforced my knowledge on all sides.
Combining two phrases, when you practice what you preach, you'll
make perfect (at least in this instance).
Practice makes permanent - not perfect. Only perfect practice makes perfect!
ReplyDelete